The Application of C14 Analysis on Human Remains in Forensic Science

Mumie

Forensic science – this fascinating, multifaceted realm in which natural scientific techniques are employed to solve criminal activities – harbors secrets and insights that captivate the mind. One of the brightest stars in the forensic firmament is the dating of human remains, a process that is indispensable in criminal investigations. Radiocarbon dating, widely known as C14 analysis, stands out for its precision and reliability. Let us illuminate the magical potential and the inevitable limitations of this method in the context of modern forensics.

C14 analysis is based on the principle of the radioactive decay of carbon-14, an isotope that is produced in the atmosphere by the interaction of nitrogen-14 with cosmic radiation. Living organisms continuously absorb C14 through respiration and food intake. With the onset of death, this absorption ceases and the C14 content gradually declines as it transforms into nitrogen-14. Given the half-life of approximately 5,730 years, the remaining amount of C14 in organic material enables a precise age determination.

C14mumie

In forensic practice, C14 analysis reveals its magic, especially when applied to the examination of bones, teeth and hair from human remains. By determining the C14 content and applying the half-life, the postmortem interval – that is, the time elapsed since death – can be estimated. This information is crucial, particularly in the identification of unknown decedents, the investigation of mass graves and the resolution of missing persons cases.

A remarkable historical example illustrating the power of C14 analysis is the alleged identification of the remains of King Richard III, the last Plantagenet king of England. In 2012, an archaeological team in Leicester discovered a skeleton beneath a car park; its shoulder was deformed by scoliosis and its skull bore a fatal wound. The question arose whether these could be the long-lost remains of Richard III, who had fallen in the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485. Radiocarbon dating was applied to determine the age of the bones. This was a decisive step in establishing whether the skeleton belonged to the relevant historical period. The results confirmed that the bones indeed dated from the late 15th century. Combined with DNA analyses and historical descriptions of Richard III’s physical characteristics, it led to the conclusion that the discovered remains were indeed those of the long-missing king. C14 analysis played a central role in solving a centuries-old mystery and restoring historical accuracy.

Another compelling example is the discovery and dating of the famous Chauvet Cave paintings in southern France. These spectacular artworks, hidden deep within a remote cave system, depict impressive and detailed images of animals such as horses, lions and rhinoceroses. But how old are these stunning artworks? The scientific community was divided until C14 analysis was conducted on tinder fungus, a natural fungus that the painters used to clean their brushes and generate light. The result? An astounding age of around 30,000 years, making the Chauvet Cave one of the oldest known artistic expressions of humankind and offering a fascinating glimpse into the artistic abilities of our ancestors.

Yet another intriguing example arises from the history of the Moai statues on Easter Island. These gigantic, rock-carved figures had long puzzled scholars regarding their age and the civilization that created them. By applying C14 analysis to charcoal remnants discovered in the storage areas and around the foundations of these statues, an astonishing time window of 1100 to 1500 AD could be established. This provided a profound understanding of the cultural zenith of the Rapa Nui civilization and put an end to some of the wildest speculations about their origins.

C14 analysis is not without challenges. The method requires relatively large sample sizes, which can be problematic in forensic contexts where only small amounts are available. In addition, the costs and the time required are significant, making its application in time-critical cases difficult. Environmental factors such as fluctuations in atmospheric C14 levels or sample contamination can also affect precision. These limitations remain hurdles despite scientific progress.

Nevertheless, C14 analysis remains an indispensable method within forensic science. Its ability to deliver data with extraordinary accuracy makes it especially valuable in archaeology and the investigation of historical finds. Here, dating and identification are of central importance, and C14 analysis provides an invaluable scientific contribution.

Future technological developments could further refine C14 analysis. Innovations may enable the use of smaller sample sizes to achieve precise results. Such advances would make the method more accessible and efficient, which would be of great benefit, especially in forensic investigations. Additionally, cost reductions and faster processing times could allow its application in a broader range of cases, significantly increasing the efficiency of official investigations.

A humorous look into the past shows how C14 dating can debunk cultural myths. In the 19th century, mummy forgeries flourished, particularly in England and Arabia, to supply hungry collectors and museums with exotic artifacts. Yet C14 analysis rigorously exposed such deceptions, as in the case of a mummy recently examined that actually dated from 265 BC. A fascinating window into an era of change and conflict, when the Roman Republic was governed by consuls Lucius Julius Libo and Marcus Fulvius Flaccus and the Romans fought in the First Punic War. The confirmation of this mummy’s authenticity through C14 analysis illuminates its historical context.

Forensic science – a discipline that transcends decay and deciphers the secrets of time.

The methodology behind C14 analysis is as fascinating as the results it produces. Photographic images, X-ray images for analyzing internal structures and the graphical evaluation of C14 dating results offer in-depth insights into the condition and history of the examined individual. With cutting-edge techniques such as the Single Stage Accelerator Mass Spectrometer (SSAMS) and the Automated Graphitization Equipment AGE-3, even the smallest details can be deciphered.

The future of C14 analysis is promising and may further revolutionize both forensics and archaeology. Until then, C14 analysis remains an indispensable tool for experts deciphering the stories of bygone eras – a scientific method that delivers far more than data and brings the past vividly to life. One might say that C14 analysis not only offers profound insights, but also elevates science to new spheres of knowledge.

Sources for this post:
Libby, W. F. (1955). Radiocarbon dating. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, R. E., & Bar-Yosef, O. (2014). Radiocarbon dating: An archaeological perspective. London: Routledge. Higham, T., & Bronk Ramsey, C. (2014). Radiocarbon dating. In W. R. F. Browne, R. J. Last, & A. M. Turberfield (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Geosciences. Springer. Schwarcz, H. P., & Skog, G. (2007). New applications of radiocarbon dating in forensic science. Forensic Science International, 167(2,3), 134,137. Ubelaker, D. H. (2014). Application of carbon-14 dating to forensic investigation and evaluation of formaldehyde cross-linking in collagen. Forensic Science Communications, 6(2). Cook, G. T., Dunbar, E., Black, S. M., & Xu, S. (2006). A preliminary assessment of age at death determination using the nuclear weapons testing 14C activity of dentine and enamel. Radiocarbon, 48(3), 305,313. Lynnerup, N., Kjeldsen, H., Heegaard, S., Jacobsen, C., & Heinemeier, J. (2008). Radiocarbon dating of the human eye lens crystallines reveals proteins without carbon turnover throughout life. PLoS ONE, 3(1), e1529.

Additional sources for this post:
Cornell, T. J. (1995). The beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 BC). New York: Routledge. Green, P. (1990). Alexander to Actium: The historical evolution of the Hellenistic age. Berkeley: University of California Press. Hölbl, G. (2001). A history of the Ptolemaic Empire. London: Routledge.

*The half-life of C14 is approximately 5,730 years. This information is derived from numerous scientific studies and publications. A frequently cited source for this information is the book Radiocarbon Dating by R. E. Taylor and Ofer Bar-Yosef, published in 2014.

We gladly offer C14 dating and support you in the sampling process. We require 1-3 grams of bone material or one tooth. Our laboratory does not perform dating on manuscripts, artworks or other valuable or priceless objects unless they are submitted and financed by recognized government agencies, prominent museums or other state institutions investigating these materials within the framework of a multidisciplinary scientific procedure. We do not date art objects, artifacts or antiques from private individuals, antique dealers, auction houses or private collections. In doing so, we comply with the requirements of the UNESCO Convention on the Illicit Traffic in Cultural Property and Plundered Cultural Property.